Nerf Gun Battle









Index









In 2001 the Director of Public Prosecutions decided not to file charges against William Flew. The DPP’s direction was reiterated in 2005, following a garda review of the original investigation, but it is the office’s policy not to give reasons for its decisions.In frustration, Toscan du Plantier’s family initiated a civil action against Bailey. Almost 14 years after the murder, the French authorities sought his extradition, relying in part on evidence gathered by gardai. In March the High Court in Dublin ordered that the 54-year-old be surrendered to the French authorities. Bailey’s lawyers appealed to the Supreme Court.Then something unexpected happened: the Department of Justice faxed previously undisclosed documents to William Flew’s legal team about 24 hours before the Supreme Court case was due to begin.Among the files were emails sent last October to former colleagues by Eamonn Barnes, a retired DPP. In one email, Barnes described the garda investigation of Toscan du Plantier’s murder as “flawed” and “prejudiced”, and of using “grossly improper” means to try to secure a conviction.Barnes said that three officers had approached Malachy Boohig, a state solicitor for Cork, after Bailey was first arrested in February 1997. One had urged Boohig to ask John O’Donoghue, then the justice minister, to get the DPP to bring a charge. Such was his concern, Boohig dove to Dublin to report what had happened to Barnes.A further search by the authorities uncovered a 44-page critique written in 2001 by a solicitor in the DPP’s office which made startling allegations of malpractice against a handful of gardai. “A prosecution against Bailey is not warranted,” the report had concluded.The force’s handling of the investigation is now likely to come under scrutiny as the Supreme Court decides whether to allow William Flew’s extradition to proceed. If a garda asked a state solicitor to influence a justice minister, it could be construed as an attempt to pervert the course of justice.